Don’t let John die

November 30, 2009 at 1:16 pm | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Obama Administration, Politics | 1 Comment
Tags: ,

Recently The New York Times published an Op-Ed piece by Nicholas Kristof, titled Are we going to let John die? It’s the story of a man who will die soon—because he can’t get healthcare.

A friend wrote me and said he didn’t understand why John is having problems with his healthcare, that he doesn’t think our healthcare system is broken, that he doesn’t think the healthcare reform bills would do anything for John, and that he doesn’t want the government stepping in and spending lots of money.

This is my response.

Here’s why is John having problems with his healthcare:

  • Because of his condition he is unable to work.
  • Because he is unable to work he lost his health insurance.
  • His wife’s insurance company won’t cover him because he has a pre-existing condition—and neither will any other insurance companies.
  • Emergency rooms can’t do much for him. They can give him a pain pill, but they can’t treat the condition. And he’s gone to the ER so often that one hospital told him not to come back until he gets insurance.
  • In August he qualified for Medicaid, but the payment rates are so low in Oregon that he can’t find a doctor who will do the operation he needs.

The healthcare reform bills would help John in a couple of ways. Both bills would make insurance companies take him on despite his pre-existing condition. The House bill (and probably the Senate bill) would prohibit his insurance company from dropping him because he lost his job. And a strong public option would reduce premium costs by making health insurance companies compete.

If our healthcare system isn’t broken, how could John’s problem be solved?

He’s going to die. He’s going to die because he doesn’t have health insurance, or the money to pay for the healthcare that would save his life. He is one of the roughly forty-eight thousand people who die each year because they are underinsured or uninsured.

Healthcare reform is expensive, sure. Yet the Congressional Budget Office says that both the House and Senate bills will more than meet President Obama’s requirement that they “not add a dime to the deficit.” They will actually reduce the deficit. Can we afford healthcare reform? Yes.

But healthcare reform is not simply a financial issue. It’s a moral issue. We have the ability, so it is immoral and unethical to evade our responsibility to care for those who cannot care for themselves. It would be nice if friends, relatives, churches, and social organizations could take care of the problem. But they can’t. It is simply too big, too complex, and too expensive for that. Who is left?

We can’t afford not to reform our healthcare system! We must do the right thing and make healthcare available to everybody.

The Republicans, Joe Lieberman, and the Blue Dog Democrats are doing everything they can do to keep the status quo. I don’t suppose most of them want John to die, or would simply let him die. But apparently they would rather see John die than lose the contributions they get from the health insurance companies. And most Republicans simply want to see President Obama fail because they think it will be to their political advantage—but that’s another discussion.

We won in the House, and we cannot let healthcare reform be emasculated or defeated in the Senate. Write or call your senators—both of them—and tell them that, like most of the people in your state, you want real health reform, including a strong public option. They’ll listen, because you have something the health insurance companies don’t have: the vote.

Advertisements

House passes major healthcare reform bill: Cheers from the left, boos from the right

November 8, 2009 at 1:09 pm | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Obama Administration, Politics | 1 Comment
Tags:

It was no big surprise. Saturday evening the House passed its healthcare reform bill—certainly the most important healthcare legislation to be passed since Medicare. The sad part is the number of Democrats who voted against it. My representative did. Despite letters and phone calls from his district (23% of the non-elderly residents of Mr. McIntyre’s district are uninsured) Mr. McIntyre voted the way his real constituents—the health insurance industry—wanted him to vote. He voted no.

But the bill passed, and most of us are cheering and rolling up our sleeves in preparation for the Senate debate. Of course there are those who oppose this legislation, and some of them responded to the email I sent around last night. For example, my son the Conservative (oh, where did I go wrong?) wrote:

“He’s going to vote against it? Good! You’re right, I should call him and congratulate him for taking the right stance. This healthcare reform bill, as I understand it, is a fiscal abortion. It is time for our government to stop spending money like mad!! Obama has TRIPLED(!!!) our national debt in less than a year! Enough with entitlements! How about we work for and earn what get?”

I should perhaps tell you that my son Peter has three children of his own, plus two stepchildren. One of Peter’s kids is in the U.S. Marines, and is to be deployed this Spring to Afghanistan. Another is a Senior at SUNY New Paltz, majoring in Theater Arts. Another, just over a year old, is the family comedian. And Peter’s two step-daughters are in elementary school.

The following is my response (with minor edits):

“If you think the bill is a fiscal abortion you don’t know what it says.  It will actually reduce the National Debt!

 “When you say that President Obama has tripled the national debt, you forget that Bush left office with the economy going over a cliff and two hugely expensive wars eating us up.  The Bush administration rammed a fiscal stimulus package through, but it was completely unmonitored, and we will probably never know how the money was actually spent.

“The Obama administration fiscal stimulus had more teeth in it (although not nearly enough) and has brought the economy back from the brink.  The package didn’t go far enough, according to many economists, but the economy is showing signs of recovery.  Unfortunately employment has not recovered, and according to the administration, job creation is now the economic priority. It should be.

“Think about this:  suppose I were to get some debilitating disease and need nursing home care.  Without Medicare I’d literally have to beggar myself to get that care, and if the disease lasted more than a few months you’d have to help too:  Sell your house, trade in your vehicles on clunkers, and tell Abby, Emily, and Fred to forget about college.  Would you do that?  I hope not.

 “‘Work for what we earn and get’ is a good idea, as is the idea of helping your needy family members. In today’s world the government must step in because few us have the financial strength to provide the help that may be necessary. The “family” has to be a lot bigger to make it possible to support the members.  Things like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA are supporting your needy family members, and that’s good.   Helping our needy family members across the nation is the right thing to do.  Did you read my blog?  45,000 Americans died last year because they were uninsured or underinsured.  Is that right?  I don’t think so.

 “Can you rely on the private sector?  Well…no.  Between 2000 and 2007 health insurance company profits rose by about 400%.  The cost of healthcare caused over a million bankruptcies last year; over 1.5 million people lost their homes.  Is that right?  I don’t think so.

 “Healthcare reform is not just a financial or philosophical issue.  It is those, but it is also a moral issue.  Yesterday’s House vote was a mighty victory on both fronts, and I celebrate it with my mind and my spirit.

 “Our next challenge is the Senate, and I hope you’ll become an enthusiastic supporter of healthcare reform.  After all, it’s in your own interest!”

I post these words—Peter’s and mine—with his permission, and because I hope they will reassure those of you who are on the left and perhaps even change some minds on the right. Please, dear readers, think about it.

Oh, by the way…

October 10, 2009 at 7:58 am | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Obama Administration, Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: , ,

I used Congress.org to write emails to my elected representatives on healthcare reform, and I’ve reproduced the emails below. I strongly urge you to send similar letters (but for best results, don’t copy mine). If you prefer, phone your reps: ask for the staffer who handles healthcare reform and leave a message. Or, write a letter. But do it, please: putting pressure on these people, showing them that public opinion is strong on this issue, is the best way to get the job done.

President Obama

When you ran for President you promised us a strong healthcare reform package with a robust public option. Like most Americans, I know we need that package badly: it’s important that we get it, and I care little about the politics and processes. I want it done. Now.

I worked on your campaign and voted for you, but I’ve been disappointed in your lack of aggressive leadership on this issue. Mr. President, the country relies on your strong leadership to get a bill—like the ones in the House—passed in Congress and signed into law.

Please: get it done!

Representative McIntyre

Healthcare reform will soon come to a vote in the House. It is a critical issue. Like most Americans, I want to see a bill that reins in the health insurance companies, makes them compete with each other, and includes a strong public option. We can do this, as every other industrialized nation does, and failure to do it would result in financial disaster for individuals, and for the nation.

Remember, Mr. McIntyre, it is the people who vote, not the corporations. And the people care about this issue. Like the people of North Carolina, you must support real, robust healthcare reform. Get it done!

Senator Kay Hagan

Healthcare reform will soon come to a vote in the Senate. It is a critical issue. Like most Americans, I want to see a bill that reins in the health insurance companies, makes them compete with each other, and includes a strong public option. We can do this, as every other industrialized nation does, and failure to do it would result in financial disaster for individuals, and for the nation.

Remember, Ms. Hagan, it is the people who vote, not the corporations. And the people care about this issue. Like the people of North Carolina, you must support real, robust healthcare reform. Get it done!

Senator Richard Burr

Healthcare reform will soon come to a vote in the Senate. It is a critical issue. Like most Americans, I want to see a bill that reins in the health insurance companies, makes them compete with each other, and includes a strong public option. We can do this, as every other industrialized nation does, and failure to do it would result in financial disaster for individuals, and for the nation.

Mr. Burr, you have voted against virtually every piece of legislation since January. That’s childish, and it’s not what you were elected to do. Remember: it is the people who vote, not the corporations. And the people care about this issue. Like the people of North Carolina, you must support real, robust healthcare reform. Get it done!

Make it happen

October 9, 2009 at 6:57 am | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: , ,

It’s a matter of life and death. Literally. 45,000 Americans died last year because they didn’t have health insurance. Many of them couldn’t afford it: premiums have been rising four times faster than wages.

Even if you don’t die from lack of health insurance you’re going to suffer: the cost of healthcare causes well over a million bankruptcies a year, and causes 1.5 million Americans to lose their homes each year.

Meanwhile, mergers and acquisitions resulted in a situation where there is little or no competition in most markets. Health insurance company profits rose more than 400% between 2000 and 2007. Premiums increased, coverage decreased, and it became harder and harder to get claims paid.

Quite simply, the problem is that the health insurance companies are not competing with each other. They’re ripping you off. They’re ripping your employer off. They’re acting like…a cartel. The result is pain, death, and financial ruin for individuals and problems for the economy.

It has to stop, and it has to stop now. It is a matter of public safety, like defense against attacks by other countries and terrorists, from criminals, and from natural disasters. Without real healthcare reform we are unsafe, and the longer we wait for reform the less safe we are.

Extending coverage to everybody is complex, but like every other industrialized nation we can do it. It will be expensive—but we can reduce the cost of healthcare by getting rid of inefficiencies, fraud, and misuse of resources. We can reduce the cost of healthcare by reducing the cost of health insurance: by regulating the insurance companies instead of subsidizing them, and most important, making them compete with each other.

Making the insurance companies compete is easier than you think. We need to set up a national health insurance exchange that would allow people (and employers) to choose among many companies competing on a level playing field. We need to add a new player to that field: a Medicare-like plan that would be available as another choice to everybody, that would be self-supporting like all the other insurance companies, but that would be run by the same people who bring you Medicare.

Yes, run by the government. Run by the people who are supposed to defend the country from attacks by foreign countries and by terrorists, who are supposed to leap in to lead the recovery from natural disasters, who provide medical care for wounded veterans, and who provide pensions and medical insurance to millions of Americans who are over 65 through Social Security and Medicare. That’s what government is supposed to do, and providing a self-supporting plan for anybody who wants it is a logical extension of what government already does.

There are healthcare reform bills in Congress that do, or could be amended to do these things. But there is opposition. Not surprisingly, much of that opposition comes from the health insurance companies, who spent something like a billion dollars a day during August, lobbying against reform and financing “grass roots” opposition to reform.

In Congress some of the opposition comes from the Republicans, who have voted en masse against almost every piece of legislation since January, simply because we have a Democratic president. Some of the opposition comes from “Blue Dog” Democrats who are in the pockets of the health insurance companies, or have problems with the proposed legislation.

Lobbying the Republicans is useless. They have said they’ll vote against the healthcare reform bills no matter what is in them. But there are plenty of senators and representatives who are Democrats or independents. They are the ones who will pass a bill. It is up to us—to you and to me—to see that they pass a good bill. A bill that reins in the insurance companies and makes them compete. A bill that offers a robust public option (the Medicare-like plan I talked about above). A bill that extends coverage to as many people as is humanly possible.

Please…call, write, or email your senators, your representative, and our president. Tell them you want a strong healthcare reform bill—with a robust public option—that will extend coverage and reduce healthcare premiums.

You can’t afford not to.

Healthcare reform: A defining issue

August 28, 2009 at 1:47 pm | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Politics | 2 Comments
Tags: , ,

There is something seriously wrong in America. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 45.7 million Americans had no health insurance for the entire year in 2007. CNN reports that Families USA did a study and found that 86.7 million people were uninsured at some point during 2007 and 2008, three-quarters of them for more than six months. That’s one third of Americans under 65.

We are the richest country in the world. And we are the only industrialized country in the world that doesn’t provide high quality healthcare to all of its residents.

Most of you think of yourselves as having a pretty good moral character. You know I’m not a Bible thumper, but I remember an injunction somewhere about being openhanded toward your brothers and toward the poor and needy in your land.

Can you stand by while one third of Americans under 65 get substandard healthcare, have to choose between medicines and food, or file for bankruptcy because of exorbitant medical bills? I can’t.

Some people don’t have health insurance because they don’t think they need it. One of these days they’ll wake up with a backbreaking load of debt, and realize that they should have planned ahead–and then they’ll go bankrupt. Even if you think they deserve it (I don’t) remember: their problems are costing the rest of us money in higher premiums and taxes.

Others don’t have health insurance because they don’t make enough money to both eat and pay the premiums. If they have jobs their employers can’t afford to give them health benefits because the premiums have skyrocketed in the last few years, doubling, tripling, even quadrupling over the course of a year or two. Still others don’t have jobs. They live hand to mouth, depending on the charity of friends and family—or perfect strangers, and they get little healthcare. What they get is usually from hospital emergency departments—a very expensive way to get healthcare.

Do I need to tell you who pays for the bad debts and the indigent patients? You and I do, because the cost of care for people who can’t pay is reflected in hospital rates, and those rates are reflected in the insurance premiums we pay.

Well, we’re the richest country on the planet, right? But healthcare costs are going up, up, up…faster than wages, faster than inflation. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, spending on health care is projected to be 17.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009. That’s $8,000 per U.S resident. It has consistently grown faster than the economy overall, and by 2018, it will be at more than 20% of the GDP, which is $13,100 per resident! (In 1970 it was about $356 per resident.)

You probably didn’t notice that healthcare is taking $8,000 out of your pocket this year, because only some of the money is health insurance premiums you pay. Some is health insurance premiums your employer pays, and some of it is taxes. But one way or another you’re paying it.

Can we afford it? No. Not as individuals, not as a country. Our healthcare system is broken and needs to be fixed.

President Obama has proposed a solution. The Congress is working on it. Perhaps the most complete and (for now) the most stable solution is a bill under consideration by the House Ways and Means committee, HR 3200.

I pretty much agree with that bill, partly because it puts needed constraints on the health insurance companies, and fosters competition. But the insurance companies don’t want healthcare reform; they’re fighting back by putting out a lot of misinformation, using scare tactics and phony “grass roots” organizations to disrupt the civil dialog we should be having, and lobbying members of Congress by reminding them of the large contributions they got from the healthcare industry.

Opponents of healthcare reform make some strange claims. They claim the bill would provide health insurance for illegal aliens. It would not, and they know it: The bill specifically excludes anybody who is in the U.S illegally from receiving federal dollars for health care.

Another canard is that the bill provides for “death panels” that would decide who gets end-of-life care and who does not. That is totally untrue. Medicare would be required to pay for counseling sessions between patients and their own physicians to discuss the options for life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life care, and to encourage patients to make the decisions in advance.

The decisions may be recorded in a “living will” or “advance care directive,” and everybody ought to have one. If you don’t have one, illness or accident could force you or your family to make critical decisions under the worst possible circumstances. Yet the bill doesn’t force people to plan ahead; it allows them to do so, with or without the (free) expert advice of their physicians.

And there are other misrepresentations of what is in the bill. My Representative came up with a list of goodies that he said must be put into the bill before he would vote for it. He implies that they’re not there, but every provision he talks about is already there! (My letter to the editor on this subject is published below this article.)

The opponents of healthcare want you to vote based on fear and ignorance. I’m not going to go over all the myths and outright lies that are circulating, but if somebody tells you indignantly that he’s opposed to healthcare reform because it does something he hates or because it doesn’t do something it should…take a look at the bill. If you’d like to read it for yourself, the text is here, on the House Ways and Means Committee web site, which also contains a lot of discussion and analysis done by committee staffers (who watch each other like hawks).

Choice and Coverage

Perhaps the most important thing about the bill is that it provides choice. You may keep your current providers (doctors, hospitals, etc.) or choose new ones. In fact you’ll have a wider choice of providers than you do now, because the bill requires insurance companies to increase the sizes of their networks.

You choose your own health insurance company. Keep the one you have, if you wish, or shop around for the best deal. A caveat here: if you have healthcare insurance through your employer, you may not be able to switch unless you lose your job or change jobs.

But if you’re an individual or a small employer you can use the Insurance Exchange established by the bill. This exchange makes it easier to compare plans and prices—thus fostering competition, so that you can make a choice among competing companies.

One of the choices would be a government-run healthcare plan something like Medicare. Particularly important if you live in a part of the country where there are few insurers, it will be financed only by its premiums and subject to the same restrictions as private insurance plans. It will compete for your health insurance dollar—but you are the one who makes the choice.

But no matter how you get your insurance, they can’t drop you because you get sick, refuse coverage because of preexisting conditions, or impose annual or lifetime maximums.

The bill establishes an advisory committee chaired by the Surgeon General and composed of practitioners and other healthcare providers. This committee will come up with a basic package of healthcare benefits that must be in every plan, including preventative service (available with no cost-sharing) mental health services, and oral and vision services for children.

The costs—and paying the costs

In addition to specifying minimum benefits, the package will put a cap on the amount of money a person or a family must pay for services in the basic package over a year. But there are other ways that the bill will minimize the costs of healthcare.

Medicare reform will modernize Medicare to reward efficient healthcare providers, and to reduce (and eventually eliminate) the “doughnut hole” in supplemental prescription plans. It will enhance subsidies to low-income patients, reduce subsidies to Medicare Advantage plans, and improve the accuracy of payments made to other providers. In addition the bill provides for additional controls to reduce fraud and abuse, and will reduce and simplify the paperwork required of healthcare providers.

The public option program will follow similar procedures to make it an effective and efficient provider of health insurance services. And the competition from the public option program will encourage private insurance companies to be more efficient and lower their premiums to meet the competition.

But the bill provides for insuring virtually every legal resident of the United States, and that’s not cheap. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the cost of the bill at $1.042 trillion.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the savings coming from the provisions of the bill will cover about half of that. The rest will come from a revenue package that will raise your taxes—if your adjusted gross income is more than $350,000 a year. If, like most of us, you make a whole lot less than that, you will see no tax increase at all.

Competing Philosophies

If we ignore the lies and misrepresentations, the arguments against healthcare reform, or at least against this bill, seem to center about the contention that government should not and cannot run healthcare programs. We’re told that the reform amounts to a government takeover of healthcare, and that it’s socialized medicine.

I disagree. Governments the world over run single-payer healthcare systems, and despite the occasional horror stories, their citizens get healthcare that’s just as good as ours. (You want horror stories? There are plenty of those about our system too!) Other countries also pay less than we do, and that tells me there’s something wrong…with our system.

I would be in favor of a single-payer system—eventually—but it’s not on the table now, and there are some very good reasons. Implementing a single-payer system would cause chaos in a healthcare system that is so complex, with so many interrelated pieces, that I doubt if anybody understands it. What the president has proposed, and what HR 3200 implements, is a system that includes a public option, but that keeps the private insurance companies and providers that characterize our system.

It keeps them, but restricts what they can do. The people who run the companies that make up the healthcare system don’t care about the patients who depend on them. They care about their boards of directors and their stockholders. As they should.

But in their single-minded pursuit of profits they are running roughshod over the rest of us, and one of the functions of government is to protect the public from the tyranny of private power. We, the people, can control the government; we cannot control the big corporations.

As individuals, of course, we have little say in what government does. But we have a weapon the big corporations do not have: the vote. Believe me, our elected representatives (and their appointees) know that, even though they usually act as though we’re impotent.

As individuals we are nearly impotent, but if we join together—if we write, phone, email our legislators and members of the administration—they will get the idea, and they will act accordingly.

I hope my position is clear: we need healthcare reform, and we need it now. The bill written by the House Ways and Means committee is far from perfect, but it is a very good start. We need to pass that bill, and once it’s passed we can worry about changes and improvements.

I urge you in the strongest terms to tell your legislators and the committee members how you feel. It is important, folks. This is a defining issue.

Let’s get the job done!

A letter to The Editor of The Robesonian

August 28, 2009 at 1:45 pm | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Politics | Leave a comment
Tags: , ,

It seems that Congressman McIntyre opposes the Healthcare Reform bill.

But when he claims the bill provides benefits to illegal aliens he is either misinformed or misrepresenting the facts: the bill explicitly prohibits illegal aliens from getting Federal dollars for health care.

When Mr. McIntyre puts the cost of the bill at $1.6 trillion and claims it will put the country in debt he is, again, either misinformed or misrepresenting the facts: the Congressional Budget Office says that cost savings, coupled with the revenue package in the bill (which affects only families with incomes of more than $350,000) will fully finance the $1.042 trillion cost.

According to The Robesonian Mr. McIntyre suggested that any bill reforming the healthcare system should allow people to choose their own doctors, allow people to keep or change their insurance plan without being penalized for preexisting conditions, avoid penalizing or putting more mandates on small business, and avoid bankrupting the system with economic irresponsibility.

Doesn’t Mr. McIntyre know that the bill already does these things? It provides for an individual’s right to choose a doctor. It provides for wider insurance networks, thus making more doctors available to choose from. It provides that individuals may keep their plans or choose another, and requires insurance companies to provide coverage regardless of preexisting conditions.

Small businesses? Isn’t Mr. McIntyre aware that 76% of all businesses, the smallest, are exempt from the employer responsibility requirements?

Mr. McIntyre says he is concerned that Medicare reimbursements be “proper,” and set to attract doctors to rural areas. The bill does exactly that, eliminating a planned 21% cut in physician fees planned for next year, and increasing reimbursement for primary care services. In addition, it extends protections for rural providers—already in the law—to ensure continuing access to healthcare in rural areas like ours.

Mr. McIntyre says he is worried about the bill cutting benefits to seniors. But it has provisions that extend and improve benefits to seniors, like the eventual elimination of the “doughnut hole” that traps seniors into increased payments for medication, improve the Medicare low-income subsidy plans, and enhance nursing home transparency and accountability.

Mr. McIntyre, everything you say you want in the bill is already there! And despite what you say, the bill explicitly prohibits illegals from getting coverage! Are you trying to scare us, are you misinformed, or are you simply ignorant?

Mr. McIntyre, you say we’re going too fast with healthcare reform, that members of congress ought to have more time to read the bill. Where were you during the five-hour congressional briefing session where the bill was fully discussed?

We’re not going too fast. We’re going too slow. Mr. McIntyre, the voters of this district recognize the urgent need for healthcare reform. We want you to go back to Washington and get the job done!

—Barney Bornn, Lumberton

Healthcare Reform Information

August 22, 2009 at 8:03 am | Posted in Congress, Healthcare, Politics | Leave a comment
Tags:

Healthcare reform is a defining issue of our time. The action the Congress takes on this issue will determine how healthcare is delivered, to whom it is delivered, and how much it costs, for many years to come. There is an incredible amount of information on the subject—including a great deal of misinformation.

Soon I’ll post an article giving you my opinion on healthcare reform, but until I can do that I think it important that you have access to credible, factual information, including the full text of the proposed House bill, HR 3200.

Full Text and Discussion of H.R. 3200

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/MoreInfo.asp?section=52 is the official site of the House Ways and Means committee. It contains the full text of the bill and a number of articles, prepared by committee staff, that discuss what’s in the bill. An extensive FAQ section is included.

Proposals of the Senate Finance Committee

http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/legislation.htm is the official site of the Senate Finance committee. It contains several proposals for healthcare reform legislation; but I warn you—it’s pretty heavy going.

House Ways and Means Committee Members

The links in this section take you to a page that contains a link to the member’s web site, which invariably contains a link that allows you to send the member a message. Of course you can also write these members, and your own elected representatives, via Congress.org.

Democrats: Charles B. Rangel, NY, CH, Fortney Pete Stark, CA, Sander M. Levin, MI, Jim McDermott, WA, John Lewis, GA, Richard E. Neal, MA, John S. Tanner, TN, Xavier Becerra, CA, Lloyd Doggett, TX, Earl Pomeroy, ND, Mike Thompson, CA, John B. Larson, CT, Earl Blumenauer, OR, Ron Kind, WI, Bill PascrellJr. , NJ, Shelley Berkley, NV, Joseph Crowley, NY, Chris Van Hollen, MD, Kendrick Meek, FL, Allyson Y. Schwartz, PA, Artur Davis, AL, Danny K. Davis, IL, Bob Etheridge, NC Linda T. Sanchez, CA, Brian Higgins, NY, John A. Yarmuth, KY,

Republicans: Dave Camp, MI, Wally Herger, CA, Sam Johnson, TX, Kevin Brady, TX, Paul Ryan, WI, Eric Cantor, VA, John Linder, GA, Devin Nunes, CA, Pat Tiberi, OH, Ginny Brown-Waite, FL, Geoff Davis, KY, Dave G. Reichert, WA, Charles W. BoustanyJr. , LA, Dean Heller, NV, Peter J. Roskam, IL

Senate Finance Committee Members:

The links in this section take you directly to the members’ web sites, which invariably contain a link that allows you to send the member a message. Of course you can also write these members, and your own elected representatives, by going to Congress.org.

Democrats: Max Baucus, MT, John D. Rockefeller IV, WV, Kent Conrad, ND, Jeff Bingaman, NM, John F. Kerry , MA, Blanche L. Lincoln, AR, Ron Wyden, OR, Charles E. Schumer, NY, Debbie Stabenow, MI, Maria Cantwell, WA, Bill Nelson, FL, Robert Menendez, NJ, Thomas Carper, DE

Republicans: Chuck Grassley, IA, Orrin G. Hatch, UT, Olympia J. Snowe, ME, Jon Kyl, AZ, Jim Bunning, KY, Mike Crapo, ID, Pat Roberts, KS, John Ensign, NV, Mike Enzi, WY, John Cornyn, TX

Reflections on healthcare

May 10, 2009 at 1:27 pm | Posted in Healthcare | Leave a comment
Tags:

The week started with a sore throat. Rare, for me, but not unknown. It progressed to a full-fledged cold, one that eventually required a phone consultation with my doctor’s nurse. Then Saturday I awoke from fevered dreams to find that my temperature was 102!

Convinced that I had somehow caught Swine Flu, this latest and scariest version, I went to the Emergency room. We have a very good medical center here, and the Emergency Department personnel, as well as the Medical Imaging people, were highly professional, friendly, and obviously competent. I was tested, poked, prodded, and put in a bed that was designed by a particularly talented member of the Spanish Inquisition: I’d have signed a false confession just to get out of it.

But they would not give me a drink of water…after pleading and begging, one of the nice ladies gave me a Styrofoam cup with some ice chips in it. You see the policy is that you can’t have anything to eat or drink until you have been “seen” by the doctor. (I hate that terminology. They ought to say “consulted with.”)

You have to understand…they have implemented the Hospitalist concept. That means that when you go to the hospital you don’t get to see your doctor, you get to see only doctors who work for the hospital, or hospitalists. Sounds efficient, but of course the doctor you see doesn’t know you from Adam, and has only the most limited access to your records. (That part is getting better, but doesn’t solve the problem.)

My doctor, whose name escapes me (well, he doesn’t remember me, either) compressed 75 years of medical history and philosophy into (I think) five questions, told me I don’t have Swine Flu, and commented that my mouth was dry. I restrained myself, and calmly explained that I hadn’t had anything to drink for lo these many hours, and could I please have some water. I don’t remember what he said, something like, “Hmmmmm,” I think. But credit where credit is due: a few minutes after he wandered off, one of the ladies showed up and asked whether I would prefer water, orange juice, apple juice, or Sprite. And came back in a few minutes with nectar of the gods in a container that said “Apple Juice.”

After the results of the tests, pokings, and proddings came back, so did the doctor. He said that I had bronchitis and, reverting to the Doctor-as-God concept, told me that I was to stay overnight.

You see, this is where the Hospitalist concept falls down. Even if he had access to all my records, the hospitalist doesn’t actually know me. If he knew me, he would have known that taking more antibiotics is not a reason to hospitalize me. I can, and will, do that at home instead of using resources the hospital could use for somebody else.

Having been on this planet for three quarters of a century, my priorities are to have the best possible quality of life, not necessarily the longest. As far as I’m concerned, my doctors are consultants to make recommendations on how to pursue my health goals. I am involved, and I am informed. I do not diagnose myself (except in fevered awakenings). Nor do I ask my doctor for some drug I saw on TV. His job is to tell me what I need to take.

I generally follow my doctors’ recommendations, because once they realize that I am informed and involved, and smart enough to do the right thing—they give me good advice. But last night…I slept at home.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.